"IN DEFENSE OF RURAL AMERICA"
a weekly column published every Sunday by
Ron Ewart, President of the
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RURAL LANDOWNERS
For the week of:
Sunday, December 16, 2015
The "In Defense of Rural America" column archives are available HERE.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
SPECIAL EDITION -
"What If They Are All Corrupt?"
From * In Defense of Rural America *
By Ron Ewart, President
National Association of Rural Landowners
and nationally recognized author on freedom and property rights issues.
We are helping to spread freedom and liberty around the globe.
© Copyright Sunday, December 16, 2015 - All Rights Reserved
The Founding Fathers went to great lengths to think of everything that could possibly happen, when drafting the U. S. Constitution and all-in-all, they did a pretty good job of it. But like so many things in life, decisions, rules and laws are based on certain assumptions. If the assumptions are wrong the decisions, rules and laws can also be wrong, misguided, or result in unintended consequences.
In establishing the three branches of government the Founders assumed that each branch would operate independently under the limits of the constitution, but that no one branch could go off the tracks far enough that the other two branches couldn't bring the errant branch back on the tracks. They further assumed that there would be sufficient individual members in each branch of government that would be honorable, honest, forthright and would right a wrong if they saw one. If one or more members strayed from the constitution, or engaged in illegal or unethical activity, those honest members would use the applicable legal mechanisms to correct the situation, or make such a fuss that public opinion, armed with sufficient votes, would drum the bad members out of office. The assumption being that there would always be more honorable office holders than dishonest ones. In other words, the process was assumed to be self-correcting.
Unfortunately, with all of their prowess, vision of the future and the knowledge of history and human behavior, the Founders erred badly in their assumption that a body of men who hold power would not continuously strive to increase their power, in spite of the Separation of Powers doctrine embedded in the core of the constitution. They further erred in assuming that the PEOPLE would pay attention and hold those men with the power, accountable. Both assumptions have turned out to be grossly wrong and what you see around you today, nationally and internationally, are the result of those wrong assumptions.
The Founders provided mechanisms in the constitution for weeding out the bad ones through impeachment or recall proceedings. Except for one thing; these men and women of power will protect their own and there is no inside power to keep them from doing so. The only other power to offset the corrupt ones is the outside power of WE THE PEOPLE through our votes. That only works if the outside power even cares.
The lust for power is all consuming and can be for way too many politicians, a deep-seated obsession or compulsion. The objective being, stay in power at any cost, or by any means to feed the obsession, not unlike a drug or alcohol addiction. Corrupt power is contagious and can infect those around the corrupt ones. Many new politicians, consumed by the desire to do good by getting elected to office, soon find when they get to their post, they have no power at all, other than what is dolled out to them by the senior “established” politicians. If a new politician makes any attempt to change the system or to weed out the corruption, he is immediately ushered off to some non-descript area where he can do no more harm. If he is ineffective as a politician, he soon loses his seat to a more aggressive politician who is eager to "play ball". Corruption then becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.
One of the sad weaknesses of man is his desire to find and elect a leader that will lead that person personally out of a negative condition, or save him or her from a disaster. As America grew in population, the number of people within the population who possessed that weakness has grown, almost exponentially, aided and abetted by a government all too willing to provide the salvation, but at a price. The price was the person’s vote. The salvation came, unconstitutionally, out of the public treasury.
America now has more people looking for a leader (savior) to save them personally from the ravages of nature or man-made disasters (such as government tyranny, foreign threats, economic collapse, income in-equality, climate change, or the one-world-order) than ever before.
America was originally founded on the hardy, self-reliant, strong individual looking to themselves to solve their own problems because there was no government assistance available, as there shouldn’t have been. Since the time of FDR and thanks to FDR, people now look to government or government leaders to solve their personal problems. That includes individuals from both sides of the political spectrum expecting that the next president, senator, or congressman would listen to their plight and hand them a silver dollar, or go get the bad guys with a vengeance.
For many decades the American people have become more and more isolated from government and the government executive, legislative and judicial system, at every level. Government “of the people, by the people and for the people” has become abusive, tyrannical and corrupt. The “Consent of the Governed” has become virtually meaningless. The “System” is in control, not the people. (See: “The System _ Impenetrable, Inflexible and Un-Yielding”) This condition has allowed corruption to literally explode.
The people see the isolation and separation happening but don’t know how to fix it. Since the people are divided them selves and won’t come together in unity to fix the real problems, they look to their leaders to solve those problems even though those very same leaders are the leaders from which they feel isolated and whom they believe are hopelessly corrupt.
A while back we watched a special on the corruption that is "earmarks" in the U. S. Congress. The moderator trotted out three examples of where politicians used earmarks to profit individually, or provide funds to their family members, using the taxpayers' money to do it; millions of dollars of taxpayers' money. These congressmen have not been punished, penalized, sanctioned, demoted, or voted out of office for their misdeeds. One congressman that the moderator interviewed, who has made attempts to clean up the practice of earmarks, has found himself ostracized and removed from the his committee assignment. The senior ones "esplained" it to him. The message was, “don't mess with the system!”
In their obsession to remain in office, the corrupt ones will promise any amount of taxpayer money to be dolled out to those who have not earned it, in the hopes that the recipients of taxpayer money will vote to keep the politician in office. Or they will use their political power to pander to special interests that can also garner votes, favors and money. The corrupt politicians have been so successful that the lion's share of the politicians in federal, state or local government, are corrupt, as well as the lobbyists they pander to, as are the recipients of our taxpayer money, who got something for "free". We now have a condition in which the politicians do not care anything about constitutional limits because they have found they can violate those limits with impunity. Once the precedence's have been set to violate their oath of office to preserve, protect and defend the constitution, and there is no penalty for their violations, the practice continues unabated. Corruption has become the “normal”, expected and accepted by the people.
Now we know that not all politicians are corrupt and some are actually trying very hard to make a difference. But the inertia of the "system" and the length of time that it has been corrupt, makes their job almost impossible unless ...... the PEOPLE give them a hand and certain limits are placed on politicians, which we discuss below.
So what if most of the politicians are corrupt, in one form or another? What if they all have decided that the system is King, even if it is corrupt, and to survive and stay in office, they have to "play ball", no matter what their political affiliations may be? To expect that the politicians or the bureaucrats, at any level of government, will clean up their own act, is naive at best and dangerous at worst. There are five peaceful solutions to a situation that is hopelessly out of control and decidedly corrupt, with our very freedom and liberty in peril.
1) Term limits must be demanded by the people and instituted at all levels of government. Period! No more than two consecutive terms for any office holder in any federal, state or local position. Why should the President be limited to two terms but all other office holders can make a career out of being a politician? A career that eventually leads to a system of corruption, which we have now.
2) A strong oath of office must be required to be sworn to on oath by all office holders and the penalties for the violation of that oath must be stiffened to heavy fines and imprisonment.
3) Penalties for exceeding the limits of the federal or state constitutions must also be stiffened with severe fines and imprisonment. Right now there are very few penalties for being a corrupt politician. Hillary Clinton is a prime example.
4) The head or director of any bureaucracy can be in office for no more than four years. When a bureaucrat is found guilty of fraud, corruption, abuse or waste of the taxpayer money, they must be punished to the full extent of the law, instead of being promoted, as happens far to often. If there is no punishment for illegal or corrupt behavior in government, there is no deterrent.
5) The voters have got to take a deeper interest in politics and get involved on a much larger level than they are now.
In short, the voters had better start holding their elected officials accountable and to the limits of the constitution, or they get what they deserve; waste, fraud, abuse and corruption. And they are today, getting what they deserve for not paying attention for far too long, to those who hold power over them. It isn’t going to make any difference the name or the party of the President, or the party in control of Congress.
What are the odds that any of these five items will be accomplished? In the current American political climate and the mindset of the masses, the odds are slim to none.
But, if the foregoing steps are not taken and soon, there may be only one other solution left to those of us who cherish liberty and are determined to see that it is defended and maintained in perpetuity for our children and our grand children. The final solution, if imposed, will seriously disrupt the lives of all Americans, perhaps beyond repair. It is our firm hope that the final solution will never become necessary.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ron Ewart, a nationally known author and speaker on freedom and property issues and author of his weekly column, "In Defense of Rural America", is the President of the National Association of Rural Landowners, (NARLO) a non-profit corporation headquartered in Washington State and dedicated to restoring, maintaining and defending property rights for urban and rural landowners. He can be reached by e-mail for comment at firstname.lastname@example.org or by 'phone at 1 800 682-7848.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
COMMENTS: Should you desire, you can e-mail a comment to this article at: email@example.com. Worthy, thoughtful comments, in our sole discretion, will be posted below the article. Comments that use foul language, pejoratives, or attacks against others will be discarded. Be sure to include your full name, as blind e-mail comments will not be posted.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ONE OF THE
Signs on the
Thousands of these huge 18" x 24" aluminum signs have been installed on urban and rural land all over America and they have proven to be a significant deterrent against trespass by government agents and other would-be intruders. Determine for yourself by clicking on the image below.
- - - - - - - - - -
Are you being beat up by government from land use code violations, draconian new environmental laws or being threatened with eminent domain, we can help. Check out the "NARLO Offense" by clicking on the image.
A Video on the clear distinction between liberalism and conservatism
LIBERALISM vs. CONSERVATISM